Enter your email address to receive new posts in your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Like what you see? Share!

Our Attorneys

Entries in Compensation (9)


House Tax Bill Targets Deferred Compensation Earned After January 1, 2018 (Really)

It’s early days yet for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act released last week by the House Ways and Means Committee, but one thing is clear:  Congressional tax writers are scouring the landscape to find a combination of more revenue and accelerated revenue from various sources in order to pay for the substantial cuts in income taxes promised by the House Bill. Learn more about the House Tax Bill, including sweeping changes to deferred compensation and narrow restrictions on deductible compensation under code section 162(m), on the Verrill Dana website.

Click to read more ...


Executive Compensation Reporting After Dodd-Frank

Financial institutions are subject to numerous rules governing compensation, including a number we have discussed in prior blog entries.  Among the new regulatory developments arising from Dodd-Frank are new disclosure requirements with respect to compensation paid to executives who work at SEC-reporting companies.  One example is the “say-on-pay” rule promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which is already impacting SEC-reporting financial institutions.  Additional requirements are already in the SEC’s pipeline.  Greg Fryer and Gabriel Weiss, members of Verrill Dana's Securities Law Group, have written an article on recent developments in executive compensation disclosures under Dodd-Frank, applicable to SEC-reporting institutions.  In their article, Executive Compensation Reporting After Dodd-Frank: Where We Came From and Where We Are Heading, the authors discuss the evolution of executive compensation reporting requirements and a look at additional future complexities that will be coming down the road.


CFPB Issues Final Rules Governing MLO Compensation Restrictions and Other Requirements under Regulation Z

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) recently issued a final rule (the “Final Rule”) implementing restrictions on mortgage loan originator (“MLO”) compensation under Regulation Z (Truth in Lending), along with additional interpretive guidance. These restrictions, which prohibit MLO compensation based on mortgage loan terms, or “proxies” for such terms, were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act. In a number of prior blogs, we discussed the CFPB’s evolving guidance on these restrictions. One issue of particular interest was whether profit-based retirement and bonus plans would be prohibited under the rationale that profit serves as a “proxy” for certain loan terms such as interest rate (a view taken by Federal Reserve staff members when the rule was first introduced).

Click to read more ...


CFPB Proposes Amendments to Regulation Z for MLO Compensation Restrictions

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has issued a proposed rule for public comment that would amend Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The amendments would include, among other things, new rules governing the participation of mortgage loan originators (“MLOs”) in employer profit-sharing plans.  Under Regulation Z, MLO compensation cannot be based on mortgage loan terms and conditions, or “proxies” for such terms and conditions.  In a prior blog, we discussed the issue of whether, under Regulation Z, MLO participation in a profit-sharing compensation plan could be prohibited under the rationale that profitability is a “proxy” for mortgage loan interest rate (a loan term).

 The proposed rule provides additional guidance with examples of when factors used to determine compensation could serve as “proxies” for loan terms and conditions.  In addition, the proposed rules states that employer profit-based contributions to 401(k) plans, employee stock plans, and other “qualified” plans would be generally permissible, provided that contributions are not based on the terms of an MLO’s individual transactions.  Bonuses and contributions to non-qualified profit-sharing plans from general profits would be permitted provided that (i) contributions are not based on the terms of an MLO’s individual transactions, and (ii) in the prior tax year, not more than a certain percentage of the person’s or business unit’s revenues are generated from the person’s mortgage business.  The CFPB is seeking comment on whether the threshold should be 25% or 50%. Bonuses and contributions to non-qualified profit-sharing plans from general profits would also be permitted if an MLO closed five or fewer mortgage transactions during the 12-month period preceding the employer’s determination to make a payment.  Public comments on the proposed rule (which may be made online) are due by October 16, 2012.


FDIC Issues Statement on Payments to Mortgage Loan Originators

The FDIC has issued a statement in follow-up to a bulletin by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) regarding the compensation of mortgage loan originators (“MLOs”) under Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.36 (the “Rule”).  As discussed earlier this month, the CFPB recently clarified that MLOs may participate in an employer’s qualified profit sharing, 401(k), and employee stock ownership plans (“Qualified Plans”) even if contributions are taken from a profit pool derived from mortgage originations subject to the Rule. 

The CFPB’s bulletin did not provide guidance regarding other compensation plans, but promised further clarification in a future rulemaking.  For examination purposes, the FDIC will expect compensation plans to be consistent with the Rule, CFPB guidance, and Rule commentary.  The Rule is intended to protect consumers from unfair or abusive lending practices, while preserving responsible lending and sustained homeownership.  Pending further guidance from the CFPB, the FDIC will review compensation programs on a fact-specific basis in light of an institution’s compliance efforts and particular circumstances.